data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32d90/32d90f09f025544d93f71d49f8a4b5bbc07edffb" alt="Corps conference"
Maj. Gen. Michael Walsh, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Mississippi Valley Division Commander, explains to the news media on May 9 what the Mississippi River will be allowed to do during the flood of 2011. As the map clearly shows, it will be permitted to move only in straight lines. (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers photo)
The headline in USA Today yesterday read: “Mississippi Flooding Redeems Army Corps.” Also yesterday, a Daily Impact commenter (a troll with no cogent argument, so you will not read the rest of his rant here) asked: “Don’t you get tired of predicting disasters that never happen?” Hard to know where to start, but let’s try here:
- How can the Corps be redeemed for handling an emergency that is only about halfway through its course?
- Warning of danger, and quoting authoritative people describing what could happen, is not the same thing as “predicting disasters.”
Let’s take another look at the Mississippi situation. Continue reading