Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: RSS
For decades the prevailing assumption has been that the primary enemies of environmental health, the essential aiders and abetters of catastrophic climate change, were the barons of industry, who sacrificed the planet for profit. Undeniably, they played a part. But they are not the main villains of this story.
An example: the speaker at the service-club meeting had done a good job of summarizing the scary, looming effects of climate change, he had the audience’s attention and concern. A questioner raised his hand: “We hear all this dire stuff but nobody ever says exactly what we have to do to avoid it.”
“Okay,” said the speaker, “let’s start with this; how about a 15% surcharge on all energy produced by fossil fuels to encourage conservation and fund mitigation?” The answer was immediate: “Oh, hell, no!”
And there you have it. The American consumer absolutely refuses to be inconvenienced or penalized in any way in order to deal with a threat that looms over the future of humankind on earth. If you can solve it without interfering with my lifestyle, fine, otherwise, “fuggedaboudit.” Continue reading