Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: RSS
[A beach house in Rodanthe, North Carolina succumbs to risings seas. Unthinkable?]
We are faced today with any number of situations that are at first glance incomprehensible, that are so far outside our experience and prior knowledge that they are, in a word, unthinkable. For example:
A recent study examined what would happen in three large Southern cities if a multi-day power blackout occurred during a multi-day heat wave. Such blackouts have doubled in number in the U.S. since 2015, while the number and severity of heat waves has been steadily increasing. If the concurrence occurred in Phoenix, according to the study, half the city’s population, nearly 800,000 people, would need emergency-room care for heat stroke and heat-related illness. Phoenix has 3,000 emergency-room beds. The study estimates that 12,800 residents of the city would die.
This would be a mass casualty event worse than the deadliest weather event in U.S. history, the Galveston Hurricane of 1900, in which about 8,000 people died.
12,000 dead in a single city from hot weather? Unthinkable.
Last year, in rapid succession, three waterfront homes in the barrier-island community of Rodanthe, North Carolina, fell into the sea, victims of relentless sea-level rise caused by global warming. Another 12 homes nearby are in imminent danger. Desperate homeowners are spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to move their homes back from the advancing waters, costs that are not covered by insurance. They are clamoring for the government — someone — to do a beach replenishment, which involves dredging sand that has washed out to sea and piling it back up on the beach. It would cost $40 million to do and $175 million to maintain for 30 years. No one has the money, or knows where to get it.
A century-old beach community wiped out by rising sea levels driven by climate change? Unthinkable.
State Farm Insurance, the largest property insurer in the state of California, announced last week that it will no longer issue policies in California because of the risk of wildfires. This is just the latest sign of widespread deterioration in the health of insurance companies which are being bled dry by the cost of climate-change-fueled destruction. In Florida and Louisiana, the entire industry is on its knees because of the massive costs of last year’s Hurricane Ian. Several insurance companies have simply disappeared, and the state agencies designed to pay the claims of their policyholders are tapped out. Those who can get insurance in the region are paying triple the rates of just last year, four times the national average, about $6,000 a year for the average home. The situation is survivable as long as no more hurricanes come ashore in the Southeast.
No insurance for beach houses in Florida and forest retreats in California? Meaning the abandonment of two of Americans’ favorite habitats? Unthinkable.
New York City is racing to complete a 2.5-mile-long, 16-foot-high system of seawalls and floodgates along the shore of Lower Manhattan. The $1.45 billion dollar project was launched after Hurricane Sandy killed 44 people and inflicted $19 billion dollars in damages in New York City alone. If the next superstorm were to succeed in flooding central Manhattan, which is relatively low lying, it could shut down the financial center of the country and much of the world.
The global financial system crippled by a New York storm? Unthinkable.
Meanwhile, what is taking up all the attention of the country’s movers, shakers and chatterers? Abortion bans, book bans, drag-queen bans, trans athlete and bathroom bans, voting restrictions, proposed limitations on social programs such as Social Security and Medicare.
You know, things that used to be unthinkable.
We really have not evolved enough for the technology we have somehow been able to develop which for a race of people who seem to not be able to plan any further out than where the next Super Bowl will be played that’s not good news; though I must say native Americans kept things balanced and in capable hands for roughly 10,000 years or more and based long-range decisions on what would that decision be like for say a second or third generation, not just for those making the decision for that generation.
Oh, and I forgot to thank you for keeping this post open your wisdom has been a boon for those of us who enjoy intelligent thinking!
Thanks for the good thoughts. I would like to do more, but…
Better add a few more inches to that seawall — Manhattan is sinking due to the weight of all the skyscrapers.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/may/19/new-york-city-sinking-skyscrapers-climate-crisis
Turns out, as I now understand it, that it’s not the skyscrapers, because they are anchored in bedrock. It’s the lesser buildings that rest on earth that are causing the sinkng.
Talk about Phoenix, as it turns out the local government there has curtailed issuing new residential building permits due to “insufficient ground water” to support expansion. I guess they are referring to underground aquifers, which, I believe, when they run dry…well, they run dry!
Yet people are still moving to Phoenix in droves. Why?
Depends on the aquifer, some are restored by seasonal rain/snow (if they keep coming), ‘fossil’ aquifers (those deposited by the last Ice Age) no.
Will the sea walls and floodgates be called the “King Canute Cribbing”? At least Canute was trying to demonstrate the limit of his power, these folks seem entirely unaware of any. What’s more there is a dark irony to building a seawall in response to AGW, when one considers the enormous energy used to manufacture cement. The kiln is so hot that old tires are added to supplement the natural gas and it burns even the steel beads!
The financial system? NYC’s should hope to last long enough to be ruined by seawater before it drowns in its own greed.
Byron may have had Canute in mind while penning:
“Roll on, thou deep and dark blue ocean – roll!
Ten thousand fleets sweep over thee in vain;
Man marks the earth with ruin, his control
Stops with the shore – upon the watery plain”
Thanks a lot, Janet, for letting us know that our standard of living will collapse — you’re pretending that you had nothing to do with this, “it’s natural”:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/a-natural-way-to-diversify-janet-yellen-now-says-americans-should-expect-a-decline-in-the-usd-as-the-world-s-reserve-currency-what-s-really-going-on-and-how-can-you-prepare/ar-AA1cAEa9?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=2485e541cc644886bfaeda3bd1951ab0&ei=16