Paul Manafort, Roger Stone, and Me

It remains to be seen what additional services Robert Mueller will do for his country, but he has performed a great one for me personally: what has come to light about Roger Stone and Paul Manafort, as a result of the Mueller investigation,  has explained a big chunk of my life that was previously obscure to me. I realize this is a revelation that is of interest to no one but myself, but it is a revelation to me, and I’m going to write about it. So there. My blog.

During the 1970s I was rising steadily in the ranks of operatives in the Republican Party. I had consulted for a number of congressional campaigns; had managed a campaign for U.S. Senate in Virginia (for a newcomer whose goal was not victory — we were running against Elizabeth Taylor’s husband, for crying out loud — but statewide credentials); I had been given (too much) credit for engineering an upset victory in a race for mayor of Akron, Ohio; had parachuted in to the Iowa precinct caucuses campaign with a team trying to resuscitate Howard Baker’s anemic presidential campaign; and had afterward been appointed manager of two states for him during what remained of his truncated campaign.

To this day I am not only satisfied with, but proud of, the candidates for which I worked in the 60s and 70s — people such as Governor Linwood Holton of Virginia, Mayor Roy Ray of Akron, Congressman J. Kenneth Robinson of Virginia, State Senators Bill Truban and  Nathan Miller of Virginia. If any of them ran today, I would vote for them if I could.

But with the advent of the Reagan Revolution beginning in 1980, it became increasingly rare and difficult for such pragmatic moderates to get nominated in the Republican Party. Terms such as bipartisan, compromise, loyal opposition, and honor disappeared from the lexicon of Republican politics, to be replaced by labels and pejoratives such as tax-and-spend-Democrats, soft-on-crime, and liberal — used without elaboration as a simple insult.

I always blamed the nastification of the Republican Party largely on Lee Atwater, who later surfaced as a Reagan adviser, and who spent 1980 showing us how to do the new Republican fandango — getting a Congress-critter elected by calling his opponent a liberal, a communist, a (white) member of the NAACP, and a past recipient of electroshock therapy, which Atwater described as being hooked up to jumper cables. Sounds normal today, but it sure didn’t in 1980.

I heard about Atwater, of course, but what I did not know until recently was that also in 1980, a new consulting firm was founded in Washington to institutionalize the new pit-bull politics. The firm was called Black, Manafort and Stone, and it soon became renowned among Washington insiders for combining in one firm lobbying and political consulting, performed with a take-no-prisoners, scorched-earth, amoral style. They lobbied for a long list of the world’s nastiest dictators and companies (including Big Tobacco), and managed campaigns for some of the nation’s nastiest politicians. Lee Atwater soon joined Roger Stone and Paul Manafort as a senior partner of the firm.

The work of these savages drove me from the Republican Party. It was they, for example,  who demonized the black, furloughed felon Willie Horton and made Michael Dukakis seem responsible for Horton’s depredations (Democrats, you see, are pro-crime). When he was dying of brain cancer in 1991, a repentant Atwater wrote a letter to Dukakis apologizing for the “naked cruelty” of that campaign. It was part of the same bunch, a long-time Atwater cohort named Karl Rove, now in service to George W. Bush, who spread the word during the 2000 presidential primary campaign in South Carolina that John McCain had fathered a black baby out of wedlock, when in fact he and his wife had adopted a brown baby from Bangladesh, well within wedlock. 

It was no coincidence, and no change of trajectory, that two of the Founding Savages — Roger Stone and Paul Manafort — worked at the highest levels of the Trump Campaign, surely one of the most unspeakable campaigns of political vandalism ever seen in America.

I suppose that if your rowboat is swamped by the wake of a yacht passing in the night, it does little good to know, 30 years later, the name of the yacht, or its destination. Still, I take some satisfaction from the fact that while I did not know the names of the people who in 1980 originated the wave that overbore me, now I know their names and destinations. Manafort is in jail and Stone is awaiting indictment. And while I do not own a single ostrich-skin jacket, neither have I ever had an official visit from the FBI.

Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Paul Manafort, Roger Stone, and Me

  1. UnhingedBecauseLucid says:

    What a surreal era it must be for an old fart like you.

    Yet, you saw it all unfold right before your eyes !

    ;)

  2. InAlaska says:

    Tom,
    We swam in the same waters, for the same side, at the same time. I’m surprised we never met then. I left a little after you did. 1991.

  3. Michael says:

    Tom: another masterful job of documenting those times. I concur with all you said. There certainly were a cast of dastardly political folks running around in those days.

    While I enjoyed the walk down memory lane, however, I think the piece is incomplete. The Republicans, to be sure, did their share, but the story ignores the sins of the Democrats, too. Just starting with JFK’s election there is plenty to talk about in terms of buying votes and corruption. (old man Kennedy was anything but a saint) Think things like Cook County. How many dead people can vote anyway? And, that was just the tip of the iceberg.

    I was in college during the 64 election between LBJ and Goldwater. In full disclosure I grew up in Arizona where my step dad was a rancher and the sheriff of Cochise County so to some extent he was involved in politics. And, Barry Goldwater was a personal family friend. I met him many times. Simply put he was not the war mongering monster the Dems painted him as… As it turned out LBJ ended up with that distinction with Vietnam and fighting the so called domino theory. He was also able to run up a sizable national debt with his Great Society and the war. The point being that I think this was a fairly corrupt election and lacking civility in many ways.

    I could go on, but I know you probably know this history better than me. So, while the Republicans surely did take dirty tricks to new heights they did not invent them. Both parties are complicit. To cast the Republicans as the solo bad guys is, as I stated, an incomplete story.

    Again, enjoyed the piece and would love to see what Paul Harvey used to say, “the rest of the story.”

    • Tom Lewis says:

      Mike,thanks for weighing in, I sure did not mean to suggest that the Republicans were the only ones degrading politics in recent decades, just that they have been by far the most enthusiastic about doing it openly and frequently. It would take a lot more than 600 words to tell the whole story.

    • Greg Knepp says:

      “the gods do bear and will allow kings, the things which they abhor in rascal routs.”*

      I’m not going to aver that ‘there’s nothing new under the sun’ because that might miff certain parties. Still, I must agree with Michael. I well remember the Democratic party’s ‘atomic bomb vaporizes cute little girl’ TV ad of the Goldwater-LBJ contest…Then a young east coast liberal, even I was taken aback! I’m not certain that I’ve yet seen its equal.

      *Poe, in his tale ‘King Pest’ attributes this quote to a playwrite named Buckhurst…I think Poe made him up. Nonetheless the quote seems salient to Michael’s comment.

  4. Michael says:

    Tom: I understand and thanks. I do so enjoy your writing.